A globally recognized e-commerce consulting
 firm specializing in engineering education and serving
universities, industry, government and professional societies.

   
 
 
 
 
Engineering Trends
1281 Hickory Lane
Houghton, Michigan 49931
U.S.A.

+1.906.482.1523
e-mail us
 
 
 REPORT 1004C - OCTOBER 2004

Master's and Doctoral Engineering Enrollment Trends for Women and Various Ethnic Groups

 

Introduction

New records in full-time engineering graduate students have become commonplace in recent years. Master's enrollments have set new records annually beginning in Fall 2000; doctoral enrollments have set new records annually beginning in Fall 2001. Full-time graduate enrollments since Fall 1975 are shown in the graph below.

 

 

Enrollment of Women in Graduate Programs

The full-time graduate enrollments of women continue to increase as well as shown in the graph above. The annual increases in doctoral enrollments are substantial, just as those of engineering as a whole. However, the master's enrollment increases in Fall 2003 were very small as were those for overall engineering. Some of the restricted master's enrollment may be due to a sharp decline in foreign national enrollments in Fall 2003.

The relative enrollments (fractions of overall engineering) of women in master's degree engineering programs provide reason for concern. As shown in the graph below, the enrollment fractions reached a maximum in Fall 2001 and decreased very slightly thereafter. The relative enrollment of doctoral students continues to increase. However, it is anticipated that the new master's enrollment trend will impact the doctoral trend in a year or so.

 

 

The apparent termination of the growth of the relative master's enrollment after a quarter century of essentially continuous growth is certainly difficult to understand. For those who would be interested in a broader perspective, the apparent new trend in master's enrollments has followed similar undergraduate trends for women:

 

  • First-year relative undergraduate enrollments of women reached a maximum of 20% in Fall 1995 and declined to 16% through Fall 2003.
     

  • Total full-time relative undergraduate enrollments of women reached a maximum of 20% in Fall 1998 and declined to 18% through Fall 2003.
     

  • Full-time relative enrollments of women in master's degree programs reached a maximum of 21% in Fall 2001.

 

Arguably, the apparently new master's degree trend stems from events that originated in the early 1990s.

Enrollments of Various Ethnic Groups in Master's Degree Programs

In recent years, full-time master's degree enrollments of students in various ethnic groups have increased substantially as shown in the graph below. The enrollment growth of Asian Americans since the minimum in Fall 1999 has been most significant. Enrollment doubled from Fall 1999 through Fall 2003 and has set new records in each of the last three years.

Full-time enrollments of African, Hispanic and Native Americans each declined to minimum in Fall 1998 and grew 35%, 69% and 37%, respectively, thereafter through Fall 2003.

 

 

Relative full-time enrollments (fractions of overall engineering) as shown in the graph below are not as encouraging as the enrollment data. The relative enrollment of only one ethnic group has increased in recent years.

 

 

The relative full-time master's degree enrollments of Asian American students declined to a minimum of 5.9% in Fall 1999. By Fall 2003, the relative enrollment had increased to 8.8% (a new record).

The relative enrollments of the African, Hispanic and Native American groups in master's degree programs have been declining. African American enrollment fractions reached a maximum of 2.8% in Fall 1996 and declined to 2.2% in Fall 2003. Hispanic and Native American enrollment fractions reached maxima of 3.4% and 0.32%, respectively, in Fall 1997. The declines through Fall 2003 were to 2.9% and 0.21%, respectively.

Enrollments of Various Ethnic Groups in Doctoral Degree Programs

The full-time doctoral enrollments of African, Hispanic and Asian American groups have all increased significantly in recent years as shown in the graph below. They each declined to a minimum in Fall 1999. Since then, they have increased to new records. Although the growth from Fall 1999 through Fall 2003 of Asian American enrollments is most striking, it should be noted that most of this increase may be regarded as a recovery from the significant decline from Fall 1995 through Fall1999. Native American enrollments appear to have remained constant since the mid-1990s, but data scatter is large.

 

 

Relative full-time enrollments (fractions of engineering as a whole) provide a somewhat different view of enrollment trends for the various ethnic groups as shown in the graph below. African, Hispanic and Native American relative enrollments have remained essentially constant since the mid-1990s. Thus, the enrollment increases have only kept pace with the growth of engineering overall.

 

 

The relative enrollments of Asian American students declined from Fall 1995 through Fall 1999. A modest recovery is underway, but the enrollment fraction of 5.8% in Fall 2003 is significantly less than the 7.2% in Fall 1995.

Summary

Full-time master's degree enrollments for women appear to have become constant and relative enrollments are now undergoing slight annual declines. Doctoral enrollments, including relative enrollments, continue to increase according to the trends established previously.

Asian American full-time master's degree enrollments, including relative enrollments, continue to follow past rapid growth trends. African and Hispanic American enrollments also continue past growth trends as well. However, their relative enrollments continued the long-term slightly declining trend.

Doctoral full-time enrollments for Asian, African and Hispanic Americans continue to increase, with Asian American enrollment growth being substantial. However, in terms of relative enrollments, only data for Asian American doctoral students continue to increase.

Acknowledgment

The degree and enrollment data for this study originated from the annual surveys of the Engineering Workforce Commission of the American Association of Engineering Societies. Engineering Trends acknowledges their efforts in providing credible data and expresses its gratitude for their services to the engineering profession

Footnotes

Engineering Trends data are compiled mainly from information submitted by universities to the annual surveys of EWC and ASEE. On the very rare occasions where errors in data appear, Engineering Trends corrects the error, if possible, or deletes the data if the error is large enough to alter significantly the trend of the university or the US total.